欢迎访问《中国卫生经济》官方网站,今天是
分享到:
我国高值医用耗材准入管理中价值评估框架探索
DOI:
CSTR:
作者:
作者单位:

作者简介:

陈英耀(1968—),男,博士学位,教授,博士生导师;研究方向:医院管理与卫生技术评估;E-mail:yychen@shmu.edu.cn。

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

R1-9;R-012

基金项目:


Exploring the Value Evaluation Framework for High-Value Medical Consumables Access Management in China
Author:
Affiliation:

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    目的:构建高值医用耗材的价值评估框架,为我国高值医用耗材的医保和医院准入管理和评价提供参考。方法:以文献研究为基础,综合应用定性访谈和定量调研。定性访谈12位资深专家,定量调研100位卫生技术评估、医保、医院管理和临床4个领域的专家,确定价值评估框架构成和各条目评分,通过卡方检验计算评分差异,对指标的推荐程度进行分级。结果:建立了以6大维度为核心,二级维度条目16个和三级维度条目50个的高值医用耗材价值评估框架。在医保和医院准入场景下,在同一场景下不同类型的专家中,条目评分表现出显著差异。将条目分级后,在医保准入场景下包含8个高推荐条目,在医院准入场景下包含24个高推荐条目。结论:价值评估应鼓励持续推动多维度的价值评估,鼓励多学科参与,不断完善医保和医院准入中高值医用耗材的管理。

    Abstract:

    Objective: To construct a value evaluation framework for high-value medical consumables, providing a guidance for medical insurance access and hospital access management scenarios in China. Methods: It conducted literature review, qualitative in- terviews and quantitative surveys. A total of 12 experts were invited for qualitative interviews, while 100 experts from four fields of health technology assessment, medical insurance, hospital management, and clinical practice participated in the quantitative survey. Through those process, it generated the composition of the value framework and the scoring of each item. Differences in ratings be- tween different scenarios and experts were analyzed through chi-square tests. The recommendation level for each item was graded. Re- sults: A comprehensive value evaluation framework for high-value medical consumables was established, which included 6 core dimen- sions, comprised 16 items for secondary dimensions and 50 items for tertiary dimensions. It showed significant differences between the medical insurance access and hospital access scenarios, as well as among different fields of experts in the same scenario. furthermore, grading the items in two scenarios. The medical insurance access scenario had 8 highly recommended items, and the hospital access scenario had 24 highly recommended items. Conclusion: Value evaluation should encourage multi-dimensional assessments and inter- disciplinary participation, continually improving the management of high-value medical consumables in medical insurance and hospital access.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

陈英耀,肖月,马丽平,等.我国高值医用耗材准入管理中价值评估框架探索[J].中国卫生经济,2023,42(12):3-8. Chen Yingyao, Xiao Yue, Ma Liping, et al.我国高值医用耗材准入管理中价值评估框架探索[J]. CHINESE HEALTH ECONOMICS,2023,42(12):3-8.

复制
分享
相关视频

文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2023-09-17
  • 最后修改日期:
  • 录用日期:
  • 在线发布日期: 2024-01-02
  • 出版日期:
文章二维码
网站二维码
期刊公众号