欢迎访问《中国卫生经济》官方网站,今天是
分享到:
DRG女性生殖系统手术治疗组细分组方法研究
DOI:
CSTR:
作者:
作者单位:

作者简介:

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

基金项目:


Study on Surgical DRG Grouping Method in Female Reproductive System
Author:
Affiliation:

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    目的:通过引入病例临床复杂性水平计算原理进行DRG细分组方法的探讨研究,为探索符合我国国情的细分组分组方法提供借鉴参考。方法:由临床专家对合并症并发症临床复杂性水平进行评分,应用病例临床复杂性水平计算模型计算每例病例的临床复杂性水平值,采用CART模型完成DRG细分组的划分,并对细分组结果进行秩和检验。结果:9个女性生殖系统手术治疗类DRG基本组被划分成18个DRG细分组,经检验各基本组内不同DRG组间住院费用和住院天数差异均有统计学意义。结论:病例临床复杂性水平计算方法的应用提高了DRG细分组结果的准确性;病案质量和编码的统一是保证分组结果合理的关键因素。

    Abstract:

    Objective: To explore reasonable methods of subdividing Adjacent DRG into DRG by introducing PCCL principle and provide appropriate DRG grouping method in line with Chinese national conditions. Methods:Clinical complexity level of each complications or comorbidities was assigned by clinicians. Patient clinical complexity level (PCCL) model was selected to calculate the clinical complexity scores of cases. Each Adjacent DRG was subdivided into DRG groups by CART model. The rank-sum test was applied to test the statistical significance of the grouping results. Results: 9 surgical Adjacent DRGs were subdivided into 18 DRG groups. There were statistical significance in the differences of hospitalization expenses and Length of stay between different DRG groups in each adjacent group. Conclusion: PCCL model showed high performance in DRG subdivision. The unification of the quality of medical records and coding is the key factor to ensure the reasonable grouping results.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

郎婧婧,周海龙,江芹. DRG女性生殖系统手术治疗组细分组方法研究[J].中国卫生经济,2017,(3):59-62. DRG女性生殖系统手术治疗组细分组方法研究[J]. CHINESE HEALTH ECONOMICS,2017,(3):59-62.

复制
分享
相关视频

文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:
  • 最后修改日期:
  • 录用日期:
  • 在线发布日期:
  • 出版日期:
文章二维码
网站二维码
期刊公众号